|
feature
Minnesota Pro Bono Pilot Program Helps Independent Inventors Gain Patent Counsel
By John
Calvert, USPTO Office of Innovation
Ed. Note: This
article is re-published here with permission
from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO).
The article originally appeared in the
August/September 2011 edition of the
Inventors Eye,
the USPTO's bimonthly publication for the
independent inventor community.
One comment most often heard from independent
inventors is that it costs too much to get a
patent. What these inventors are saying is that
they can’t afford the cost of getting competent
legal service to assist them in the preparation
and prosecution of their patent
application. This message has been repeated over
and over again in emails, phone conversations
and personal contacts with inventors from all
across the United States. We at the USPTO have
discussed this need with different legal groups
across the country and had not been given any
positive encouragement as to the possibility of
forming any type of pro bono legal service for
inventors. That is until Under Secretary David
Kappos discussed this problem with Jim Patterson
of Patterson Thuente IP, in Minneapolis, Minn.
That discussion led Jim to say, “Why not?” He
went to work on the problem and brought in
Candee Goodman, a pro bono specialist from
Lindquist and Vennum in Minneapolis. They
discussed the situation and then met with
officials at the USPTO to see how their ideas
could be used to start a pro bono program. One
year and much work later there is an official
pro bono pilot program in Minneapolis that has a
goal of helping financially needy independent
inventors and small businesses in gaining patent
counsel for their inventions.
One of the first things Jim and Candee did was
to put together a team to define how the process
would work. They started to work with LegalCORPS
of Minneapolis, an established non-profit that
assists microbusinesses and non-profits.
LegalCORPS was already dealing with pro bono
services for businesses and was a perfect match
for this new IP pro bono service. As work
progressed, it became apparent that LegalCORPS
would need to increase their capacity and staff
size to accommodate the new IP pro bono pilot
program. After much thought and discussion the
team decided that it would be appropriate to ask
the inventor to assist in covering some of the
administrative expense for LegalCORPS. The new
term for this pro bono program became, “low
bono.”
This pilot program has the backing of the
Minneapolis-St. Paul intellectual property legal
community. Not only have many intellectual
property firms stepped forward to offer legal
assistance, but many in the local business
community have also contributed financially and
with offers of service from their in-house legal
staff. With this kind of commitment from
everyone involved, the outcome should be a
rousing success.
The LegalCORPS Inventor Assistance Program was
officially launched on 8 June 2011. Since this
program is only a pilot, the organizers are
still learning what can and cannot be done to
assist inventors and needy small businesses. To
help jump start the pilot they will be looking
for inventors that are Minnesota residents that
have already filed a non-provisional
application, but find their applications in a
rejected status. In the near future, this may
expand to include individuals that have filed a
provisional application, but who need assistance
in filing a non-provisional application.
The long-term goal is to offer services to
inventors and small businesses that meet a
certain financial need level, currently 300
percent of the poverty level, have done a search
themselves or through a service provider, and
have gone through a training package currently
being developed by the USPTO. The training
package will be available on the USPTO website
within the next couple of months. Anyone who
participates in this pro bono program will be
responsible for the USPTO fees and the
administrative fee set by the LegalCORPS
Inventor Assistance Program. This administrative
fee will help make sure that the pilot program
can continue to use the services of LegalCORPS.
The USPTO is encouraging additional cities to
look at the Minnesota program to see if its
model will work for their state or
locality. There have already been encouraging
signs from across the country where other cities
are willing to proceed using the LegalCORPS
model. However, as with any pilot program, the
USPTO is suggesting caution with a wait and see
approach so that others may learn from any
difficulty found in the implementation or
operation of this first pro bono program.
The USPTO Office of Innovation Development is
also getting ready to launch an interactive map
with information for inventors by state. Any new
pro bono program will also be identified by
state on this map. The USPTO continues to work
with companies, legal associations, inventor
organizations and others to provide inventors
and small businesses with contacts, information
and assistance.
Comments may be submitted to
todaysengineer@ieee.org.
home
|